If the informers are starting at the same time as createPods,
then we can get into a situation where the pod seems to get
"lost". Instead, we wait for the informer to get into sync
prior to the createpod event.
This also moves to one informer as a microoptimization in
the tests.
Lifecycle test had a hotloop, where it would run a never-yielding
function while processing was going on elsewhere. This inserts
a sleep. A sleep is used rather than a yield to be kind to
people's battery life.
It turns out that running atomic.Read(...) in a tight loop breaks
Golang. The goroutine would never yield control over the scheduler,
so we ended up getting into a situation where the test would get
stuck forever. This moves to a different model, in which
there is a condition var, instead of atomics in loops.
* Fix the deletion test to actually test the pod is deleted
* Fix the update pods test to update a value which is allowed
to be updated
* Shut down watches after tests
* Do not delete pod statuses on DeletePod in mock_test
This intentionally leaks pod statuses, but it makes the situation
a lot less complicated around handling race conditions with
the GetPodStatus callback
This makes sure the update function works correctly after the pod
is running if the podspec is changed. Upon writing the test, I realized
we were accessing the variables outside of the goroutine that the
workers with tests were running in, and we had no locks. Therefore,
I converted all of those numbers to use atomics.