Files
virtual-kubelet/vendor/github.com/vmware/vic/tests/test-cases/Group1-Docker-Commands/1-36-Docker-Rename.md
Loc Nguyen 513cebe7b7 VMware vSphere Integrated Containers provider (#206)
* Add Virtual Kubelet provider for VIC

Initial virtual kubelet provider for VMware VIC.  This provider currently
handles creating and starting of a pod VM via the VIC portlayer and persona
server.  Image store handling via the VIC persona server.  This provider
currently requires the feature/wolfpack branch of VIC.

* Added pod stop and delete.  Also added node capacity.

Added the ability to stop and delete pod VMs via VIC.  Also retrieve
node capacity information from the VCH.

* Cleanup and readme file

Some file clean up and added a Readme.md markdown file for the VIC
provider.

* Cleaned up errors, added function comments, moved operation code

1. Cleaned up error handling.  Set standard for creating errors.
2. Added method prototype comments for all interface functions.
3. Moved PodCreator, PodStarter, PodStopper, and PodDeleter to a new folder.

* Add mocking code and unit tests for podcache, podcreator, and podstarter

Used the unit test framework used in VIC to handle assertions in the provider's
unit test.  Mocking code generated using OSS project mockery, which is compatible
with the testify assertion framework.

* Vendored packages for the VIC provider

Requires feature/wolfpack branch of VIC and a few specific commit sha of
projects used within VIC.

* Implementation of POD Stopper and Deleter unit tests (#4)

* Updated files for initial PR
2018-06-04 15:41:32 -07:00

2.9 KiB

Test 1-36 - Docker Rename

Purpose:

To verify that the docker rename command is supported by VIC appliance.

References:

1 - Docker Command Line Reference

Environment:

This test requires that a vSphere server is running and available.

Test Steps:

  1. Deploy VIC appliance to vSphere server
  2. Issue docker rename foo bar
  3. Issue docker pull busybox
  4. Issue docker create --name cont1-name1 busybox
  5. Issue docker rename cont1-name1 cont1-name2
  6. Verify that the container was renamed by checking ps, inspect and govc vm.info
  7. Issue docker run -dit --name cont2-name1 busybox
  8. Issue docker rename cont2-name1 cont2-name2
  9. Verify that the container was renamed by checking ps, inspect and govc vm.info
  10. Issue docker run -dit --name cont3-name1 busybox
  11. Issue docker stop cont3-name1
  12. Issue docker rename cont3-name1 cont3-name2
  13. Issue docker start cont3-name2
  14. Verify that the container was renamed by checking ps, inspect and govc vm.info
  15. Issue docker create --name cont4 busybox
  16. Issue docker rename cont4 ""
  17. Issue docker create --name cont5 busybox
  18. Issue docker create --name cont6 busybox
  19. Issue docker rename cont5 cont5
  20. Issue docker rename cont5 cont6
  21. Issue docker create --name cont7-name1 busybox
  22. Issue docker rename cont7-name1 cont7-name2
  23. Issue docker start cont7-name1
  24. Issue docker run --link cont7-name2:cont7alias busybox ping -c2 cont7alias
  25. Issue docker run busybox ping -c2 cont7-name2
  26. Issue docker run -dit --name cont8-name1 busybox
  27. Issue docker rename cont8-name1 cont8-name2
  28. Issue docker stop cont8-name2
  29. Issue docker start cont7-name2
  30. Issue docker run --link cont8-name2:cont8alias busybox ping -c2 cont8alias
  31. Issue docker run busybox ping -c2 cont8-name2
  32. Issue docker run -dit --name cont9-name1 busybox
  33. Issue docker rename cont9-name1 cont9-name2
  34. Issue docker run --link cont9-name2:cont9alias busybox ping -c2 cont9alias
  35. Issue docker run busybox ping -c2 cont9-name2

Expected Outcome:

  • Step 2 should result in an error with the following message:
Error: No such container: foo
  • Steps 3-15 should return without errors
  • Step 16 should result in an error containing the following message:
Neither old nor new names may be empty
  • Steps 17 and 18 should return without errors
  • Step 19 and 20 should return with errors
  • Steps 21-23 should return without errors
  • Steps 24 and 25 should succeed and their output should contain:
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received 
  • Steps 25-29 should return without errors
  • Steps 30 and 31 should succeed and their output should contain:
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received 
  • Steps 32 and 33 should return without errors
  • Steps 34 and 35 should succeed and their output should contain:
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received 

Possible Problems:

None